Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.55640/eijmrms-04-05-02

AFFINITY WHILE DYNAMIC ALONG WITH; APROPOS A NEW ADULT STYLE OF LIVING IN KATHMANDU

Abisesh Bisen , Ph. D. Anthropology, Patan Multiple Campus, Patan Dhoka Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal

Abstract

This study investigates the complex issue of patient refusal as a component of neglect in medical treatment. Patient refusal refers to situations where individuals decline or delay recommended medical care, potentially leading to adverse health outcomes. Through a comprehensive review of literature and case studies, this research explores the underlying factors contributing to patient refusal, including fear, mistrust, cultural beliefs, and autonomy concerns. Additionally, the study examines the legal and ethical implications of patient refusal for healthcare providers, highlighting the delicate balance between respecting patient autonomy and ensuring patient safety. By shedding light on the multifaceted nature of patient refusal, this research aims to inform healthcare practices and policies aimed at mitigating neglect and promoting patient-centered care.

Keywords

Patient refusal, neglect, medical treatment

References

Hiekel, N. and Castro‐Martín, T.(2014), Grasping the diversity of cohabitation: Fertility intentions among cohabiters across Europe, Journal of Marriage and Family 76(3): 489–505.

Perelli-Harris, B. & Gassen, N.S. (2012), How Similar are Cohabitation and Marriage? Legal Approaches to Cohabitation across Western Europe, Population and Development Review 38(3): 435–467.

Sánchez Gassen, N. and Perelli-Harris, B. (2015), the increase in cohabitation and the role of marital status in family policies: A comparison of 12 European countries, Journal of European Social Policy.

Rhoades, G.K., Stanley, S.M., Markman, H.J. (2012), a longitudinal investigation of commitment dynamics in cohabiting affinity, Journal of Family Issues, 33(3): 369–390.

Brown, S.L. & Booth, A. (1996), Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality, Journal of Marriage and the Family. 58 (3): 668–678. .

Rhoades, G.K., Stanley, S.M., & Markman, H.J. (2009), Couples' reasons for cohabitation: Associations with individual well being and relationship quality, Journal of Family Issues, 30, 233-258

Murrow, C. & Lin S. (2010), The Influence of Cohabitation Purposes on Relationship Quality: An Examination in Dimensions, The American Journal of Family Therapy, 38: 397–412.

Bert, P. (1998), Social Theory in the Twentieth Century, Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers, U.K.

Craib I. (1997), Classical Social Theory, London: Oxford University Press.

Cuff E.C., Sharrock W.W., Francis D.W. (1990). Perspectives in Sociology, Third Edition, Unwin Hyman Ltd. London.

Ritzer, G. (1996), Modern Sociological Theory, Fourth Edition, McGraw Hill Inc,.

Mauss, M. (1967) the Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange In Archaic Societies, New York: Norton.

Engels, F. (1988), Origin and Evolution of the Family, Population and Development Review, 14(4), 705-729.

Levi-Strauss, C. (1963), the Elementary Structures of Kinship. Beacon Press: Boston.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Abisesh Bisen. (2024). AFFINITY WHILE DYNAMIC ALONG WITH; APROPOS A NEW ADULT STYLE OF LIVING IN KATHMANDU. European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 4(05), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijmrms-04-05-02