Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.55640/jme-04-04-02

DECIPHERING SUCCESS: KEY FACTORS INFLUENCING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT EFFECTIVENESS

Cipta Murni , Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia

Abstract

Performance measurement is crucial for organizations to assess their progress, make informed decisions, and achieve strategic objectives. However, the effectiveness of performance measurement systems often varies, influenced by a myriad of factors. This paper aims to unravel the key factors that influence the success of performance measurement initiatives in organizations. Drawing on existing literature and empirical studies, we identify and analyze factors such as organizational culture, leadership commitment, alignment with strategic goals, data quality, employee engagement, and technology integration. By understanding these factors and their interplay, organizations can optimize their performance measurement practices to enhance accountability, drive performance improvements, and foster organizational success.

Keywords

Performance measurement, Effectiveness, Organizational culture

References

Akbar, R., 2011. Performance Measurement and Accountability in Indonesian Local Government. Curtin University.

Akbar, R., R, Pilcher., and B, Perrin., 2012. “Performance Measurement in Indonesia: The Case of Local Government”. Pacific Accounting Review, pp 262-291.

Artley, Will., 2001. The Per f or mance Management Handbook Volume 3: Establishing Accountability f or Performance. USA: Performance- Based Management Special Interest Group (PB MSIG).

Astuti, R. T., and Adiwibowo, A. S., 2011. Persepsi terhadap Pengembangan SistemPengukuran, Akuntabilitas, dan Penggunaan Informasi Kinerja di Instansi Pemerintah. http://www.eprint.undip.ac.id.

Braun, V., and Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Re- search in Psychology, 3 (2). pp. 77-101. ISSN 1478-0887.

Cavalluzzo, K. S., and Ittner, Christopher. D., 2003. “Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence from Government”. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29.

Creswell, John. W., 2010. Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixededisi ketiga. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, John. W., and Plano, Clark. Vicki. L., 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage.

DiMaggio, Paul. J., and Walter, W. Powell., 1983. “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-60.

Effendi, Taufiq., 2006. Modul Indikator Kinerja.Kementerian Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara.

Fachruzzaman and Norman., 2010. “Implementasi Sistem Pengukuran Kinerja Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah (SKPD) di Kota Bengkulu”. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII.

Gudono., 2012. Teori Organisasi. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Cipta Murni. (2024). DECIPHERING SUCCESS: KEY FACTORS INFLUENCING PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT EFFECTIVENESS. Journal of Management and Economics, 4(04), 07–12. https://doi.org/10.55640/jme-04-04-02