COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF GENDER DIFFERENCES IN LANGUAGE USE TO CREATE EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION PROCESS
Ergasheva Nozima Xasan Qizi , Uzbekistan State World Languages University Assistant Teacher Of The 3rd Faculty, Department Of Theoretical Aspects Of English 3, UzbekistanAbstract
This article delves into the intricate nuances of gender differences in language use and explores their implications for creating effective communication processes. By examining how men and women express themselves, we aim to shed light on the potential impact of diverse communication styles on collaboration, understanding, and overall effectiveness. Through a comparative analysis, this article seeks to provide insights into navigating these differences to foster inclusive and successful communication.
Keywords
Collaboration, gender inequalities, linguistic interruption
References
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Communities of practice: Where language, gender, and power all live. 1st ed. [eBook] Berkley: Stanford University. Available at: https://web.stanford.edu/~eckert/PDF/Communitiesof.pdf [Accessed 16 Nov. 2019].
Haas, A. (1979). Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), pp.616-626.
Holmes, J. (2001). An introduction to sociolinguistics. 2nd ed. Harlow, Eng.: Longman.
Holmes, J. (1992). Women's Talk in Public Contexts. Discourse & Society, 3(2), pp.131-150.
LaFrance, M. (1992). Gender and Interruptions: Individual Infraction or Violation of the Social Order?. 1st ed. Boston: Cambridge University Press.
Livia, A. and Hall, K. (1997). Queerly phrased: Language, Gender and Sexuality. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Makri-Tsilipakou, M. (2015). Interruption. The International Encyclopaedia of Language and Social Interaction, pp.1-7.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ergasheva Nozima Xasan Qizi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Individual articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Licence: CC-BY 4.0.