Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-04-02-02

UNVEILING CORE LEXICAL BUNDLES IN ENGLISH RESEARCH ARTICLES: A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY CORPUS ANALYSIS

Alireza Roodband , Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Letters and Humanities, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

This study conducts a cross-disciplinary corpus analysis to unveil core lexical bundles in English research articles. Lexical bundles, defined as recurrent sequences of words, play a crucial role in academic discourse by facilitating coherence and efficiency in communication. By examining a diverse corpus of research articles spanning multiple disciplines, this study identifies and analyzes frequently occurring lexical bundles. Through computational linguistics methods and statistical analysis, the study elucidates patterns of lexical bundle usage across disciplinary boundaries. The findings contribute to our understanding of disciplinary variations in academic writing and shed light on the linguistic features that characterize research articles in different fields. Furthermore, the study explores the pedagogical implications of teaching core lexical bundles to non-native English speakers, aiming to enhance their proficiency in academic writing and discourse.

Keywords

lexical bundles, English research articles, corpus analysis

References

Ackermann, K., and Y. H. Chen. 2013. “Developing the Academic Collocation List: A Corpus- Driven and Expert-Judged Approach.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12 (4): 235– 247.

Adel, A., and B. Erman. 2012. “Recurrent Word Combinations in Academic Writing by Native and Non-Native Speakers of English: A Lexical Bundles Approach.” English for Specific Purposes 31 (2): 81–92.

Alipour, M., and M. Zarea. 2013. “A Disciplinary Study of Lexical Bundles: The Case of Native versus Non-Native Corpora.” Taiwan International ESP Journal 5 (2): 1–20.

Amirian, Z., S. Ketabi, and H. Eshaghi. 2013. “The Use of Lexical Bundles in Native and Non- Native Post Graduate Writing: The Case of Applied Linguistics MA Theses.” Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning 11: 1–29.

Anthony, L. (2007). AntConc 3.2.1. Available online at http://www.antlab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/. Biber, D. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Biber, D., and F. Barbieri. 2007. “Lexical Bundles in University Spoken and Written Registers.” English for Specific Purposes 26 (3): 263–286.

Biber, D., S. Conrad, and V. Cortes. 2004. “If You Look At. . .: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks.” Applied Linguistics 25: 371–405.

Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad, and E. Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.

Byrd, P., and A. Coxhead. 2010. “On the Other Hand: Lexical Bundles in Academic Writing and in the Teaching of EAP.” University of Sydney Papers in TESOL 5: 31–64.

Chen, Y. H., and P. Baker. 2010. “Lexical Bundles in L1 and L2 Academic Writing.” Language Learning & Technology 14 (2): 30–49.

Cortes, V. 2002. “Lexical Bundles in Freshman Composition.” In Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation, Eds R. Reppen, S. M. Fitzmaurice, and D. Biber, 131–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Alireza Roodband. (2024). UNVEILING CORE LEXICAL BUNDLES IN ENGLISH RESEARCH ARTICLES: A CROSS-DISCIPLINARY CORPUS ANALYSIS. European International Journal of Philological Sciences, 4(02), 07–12. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-04-02-02