Methodology for Developing Students’ Professional Communication Competence Through Economic Terms

Authors

  • Narbayeva Malohat Associate Professor at the Department of Foreign Language Education at Tashkent State University of Economics, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-05-42

Keywords:

Economic terms, professional communication competence, terminology

Abstract

This article examines the methodology for developing students’ professional communication competence through economic terms. In modern higher education, especially in economic universities, the ability to use professional terminology correctly, clearly and appropriately is one of the key indicators of students’ communicative readiness for future professional activity. Economic terms perform not only a nominative function, but also a communicative, cognitive and professional function, since they help students understand economic concepts, analyze professional texts, participate in discussions, prepare presentations and conduct business communication. The article analyzes the theoretical foundations of professional communication competence, the role of economic terminology in language education, and the methodological possibilities of using economic terms in developing students’ oral and written speech. The research is based on theoretical analysis, pedagogical observation, comparative interpretation and generalization of methodological approaches used in teaching foreign languages for specific purposes. The results show that systematic work with economic terms increases students’ vocabulary, develops their ability to communicate in professional contexts, improves academic and business speech, and strengthens their professional identity. The article concludes that the development of professional communication competence through economic terms requires an integrated methodology based on contextual learning, communicative tasks, text analysis, interactive methods and independent work.

References

Hutchinson T., Waters A. English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-centred Approach. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. — 183 p.

Dudley-Evans T., St John M. J. Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. — 301 p.

Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Companion Volume. — Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 2020.

Nation I. S. P. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. 2nd ed. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. — 624 p.

Swales J. M. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990. — 260 p.

Robinson P. C. ESP Today: A Practitioner’s Guide. — New York: Prentice Hall, 1991. — 146 p.

Richards J. C., Rodgers T. S. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. 3rd ed. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. — 410 p.

Celce-Murcia M. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language. 4th ed. — Boston: National Geographic Learning, 2014. — 704 p.

Hyland K. English for Academic Purposes: An Advanced Resource Book. — London; New York: Routledge, 2006. — 340 p.

Ellis R. Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. — Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. — 387 p.

McCarthy M., O’Dell F. Academic Vocabulary in Use. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. — 176 p.

Halliday M. A. K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. — London: Edward Arnold, 1978. — 256 p.

Trimble L. English for Science and Technology: A Discourse Approach. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. — 180 p.

Кабанова Т. В. Терминология и профессиональная коммуникация в обучении иностранному языку. — Москва: Флинта, 2018. — 216 с.

Щукин А. Н. Методика преподавания иностранных языков. — Москва: Академия, 2011. — 336 с.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Narbayeva Malohat. (2026). Methodology for Developing Students’ Professional Communication Competence Through Economic Terms. European International Journal of Pedagogics, 6(05), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-05-42