Developing Assessment Competence of Future Physics Teachers Based on Pisa And Timss

Authors

  • Isakova Malika Iliyas qizi Doctoral Student of Nukus State Pedagogical Institute Named After Ajiniyaz, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-04-50

Keywords:

Future physics teachers, assessment competence, assessment literacy, PISA

Abstract

The preparation of future physics teachers increasingly requires strong assessment competence aligned with international standards such as PISA and TIMSS. These programmes emphasize not only content knowledge, but also scientific literacy, problem-solving, and reasoning skills. Therefore, this study proposes an integrative methodological model for developing assessment competence, combining physics content, pedagogical knowledge, international assessment frameworks, and reflective practice. The model includes motivational, cognitive, operational, analytical, and reflexive components, and is implemented through staged training from theory to practicum. As a result, future teachers are prepared to design valid, context-based, and competency-oriented assessment tasks.

References

Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to use grading to improve learning. ASCD.

Heritage, M. (2021). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Corwin Press.

Mullis, I. V., & Martin, M. O. (2017). TIMSS 2019 Assessment Frameworks. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Herengracht 487, Amsterdam, 1017 BT, The Netherlands.

Pellegrino, J. W. (2014). Assessment as a positive influence on 21st century teaching and learning: A systems approach to progress. Psicología Educativa, 20(2), 65-77.

Stiggins, R. (2005). From formative assessment to assessment for learning: A path to success in standards-based schools. Phi delta kappan, 87(4), 324-328.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29

How to Cite

Isakova Malika Iliyas qizi. (2026). Developing Assessment Competence of Future Physics Teachers Based on Pisa And Timss. European International Journal of Pedagogics, 6(04), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-04-50