
Development of Logical Thinking of Future Primary School Teachers Based on The Synectics Approach
Abstract
The preparation of primary school teachers increasingly demands pedagogical strategies that cultivate both creative fluency and rigorous logical competence. This article proposes and substantiates an instructional model for developing the logical thinking of future primary school teachers through the synectics approach, enriched with analogical materials drawn from 20th-century European prose. Synectics, with its emphasis on direct, personal, symbolic, and fantasy analogies, is positioned here not as a creativity method alone but as a structured pathway toward deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning. The study adopts a design-based and theory-grounded methodology, synthesizing literature in cognitive psychology and pedagogy with close reading of selected prose by Kafka, Woolf, Mann, Calvino, and Camus. The result is a five-phase didactic model—Prepare, Spark, Transform, Formalize, Transfer—that integrates synectic moves with formal logic tasks and metacognitive routines. Within this framework, literary episodes function as disciplined prompts that obligate students to classify concepts, define predicates, test counterexamples, trace causal chains, and articulate valid inferences. Implications include improved alignment between creative ideation and curricular logic requirements in primary education programs, a practicable blueprint for lesson planning, and an assessment scheme that indexes growth in clarity, coherence, and justificatory depth. Limitations are acknowledged regarding linguistic and cultural variability of literary sources and the need for empirical trials at scale.
Keywords
Synectics, teacher education, logical thinking
References
Gordon W. J. J. Synectics: The Development of Creative Capacity. — New York: Harper & Row, 1961.
Prince G. M. The Practice of Creativity. — New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
de Bono E. Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step by Step. — New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
Polya G. How to Solve It. — Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press, 1945.
Vygotsky L. S. Thought and Language. — Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, 1986.
Bruner J. S. The Process of Education. — Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1960.
Piaget J. The Psychology of Intelligence. — London: Routledge, 1950.
Bloom B. S. (ed.). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. — New York: David McKay, 1956.
Schön D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. — New York: Basic Books, 1983.
Black P., Wiliam D. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment // Phi Delta Kappan. — 1998. — Vol. 80, No. 2. — P. 139–148.
Kafka F. The Metamorphosis / Transl. by M. Hofmann. — London: Penguin Classics, 2007.
Woolf V. To the Lighthouse. — London: The Hogarth Press, 1927.
Mann T. The Magic Mountain / Transl. by J. E. Woods. — New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1995.
Calvino I. Invisible Cities / Transl. by W. Weaver. — London: Vintage, 1997.
Camus A. The Stranger / Transl. by M. Ward. — New York: Vintage International, 1989.
Perkins D. N. The Mind’s Best Work. — Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1981.
Hmelo-Silver C. E. Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? // Educational Psychology Review. — 2004. — Vol. 16, No. 3. — P. 235–266.
Mayer R. E. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Toulmin S. The Uses of Argument. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
Shulman L. S. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching // Educational Researcher. — 1986. — Vol. 15, No. 2. — P. 4–14.
Article Statistics
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kalekeeva Sarbinaz Turkmenbaevna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Individual articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Licence: CC-BY 4.0.