This study explores the effects of aural and written vocabulary instruction on second language (L2) listening comprehension. With the increasing importance of listening comprehension in second language acquisition, understanding the role of vocabulary instruction in enhancing listening skills is crucial. This study involved two groups of intermediate-level L2 learners, one receiving aural vocabulary instruction and the other receiving written vocabulary instruction. Pre- and post-test measures of listening comprehension were employed to assess the impact of each instruction method. The results revealed that both types of vocabulary instruction significantly improved listening comprehension, with aural vocabulary instruction showing slightly better outcomes. These findings suggest that incorporating diverse vocabulary instruction methods may lead to more effective listening comprehension outcomes in L2 learning contexts.

Aural vocabulary, written vocabulary, second language

Allan, D. (2004). Oxford placement test, 2: Test pack. OUP Oxford.

Amirzai, G. A. (2021). Assessing the effects of teaching vocabulary in developing receptive skills: A review article. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 3(3), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.32996/jweep.2021.3.3.2

Andringa, S., Olsthoorn, N., van Beuningen, C., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. (2012). Determinants of success in native and non-native listening comprehension: An individual differences approach. Language Learning, 62(s2), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00706.x

Babaei, S., Izadpanah, S., & Araújo, G. C. (2019). Comparing the effects of different advance organizers on EFL learners’ listening comprehension: Key vocabularies, previewing comprehension questions, and multimedia annotations. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1705666. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2019.1705666

Babayiğit, S., & Shapiro, L. (2019). Component skills that underpin listening comprehension and reading comprehension in learners with English as first and additional language. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12291

Bian, X., & He, J. (2017). Morphological awareness and advanced EFL learners’ listening comprehension [ Doctoral dissertation]. Seattle Pacific University. http://digitalcommons.spu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=soe_etd(open in a new window)

Bozorgian, H. (2014). The role of metacognition in the development of EFL learners’ listening skill. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2013.861303

Bozorgian, H., Yaqubi, B., & Muhammadpour, M. (2020). Metacognitive intervention and awareness: Listeners with low working memory capacity. International Journal of Listening, 36(3), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2020.1857764

Cambridge, E. S. O. L. (2014). Cambridge Key English test 4 (KET practice tests). Cambridge University Press.

Cheng, J., & Matthews, J. (2016). The relationship between three measures of L2 vocabulary knowledge and L2 listening and reading. Language Testing, 35(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216676851

Creswell, J. W. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. Dong, J. (2016). A dynamic systems theory approach to development of listening strategy use and listening performance. System, 63, 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.10.004

Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (PPVT-4). Pearson Assessments.

Feng, Y. (2017). How does mode of input affect incidental vocabulary learning [ [Master’s thesis]. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 4794]. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4794(open in a new window)

Geranpayeh, A. (2003). A quick review of the English quick placement Test. Research Notes, 12, 8–10. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/23127-research-notes-12.pdf(open in a new window)