The Rule Against Perpetuities and The Case for Its Introduction into The Law of Uzbekistan

Authors

  • Abdullaev Oybek Tashkent State University of Law, Lecturer in English law and European Union department, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/eijmrms-06-05-13

Keywords:

Rule against perpetuities, succession law, contingent interests

Abstract

This article examines the rule against perpetuities (RAP)— a legal mechanism that prevents property interests from remaining unresolved indefinitely, and justifies the need to include an adapted version of it in the civil legislation of Uzbekistan. The argument is based on the final report of the Nova Scotia Law Reform Commission for 2010 on the rule prohibiting indefinite inheritance, comparative models from Russia, Germany and Kazakhstan, as well as an analysis of the decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Uzbekistan on inheritance issues. Taken together, these sources reveal a significant gap: currently, there is no mechanism in Uzbekistan that sets a time frame for conditional property rights, and this gap creates systemic legal uncertainty in the field of law, which is becoming increasingly important in practice. The article proposes a hybrid model combining an indefinite term established by law with judicial powers to change procedures in difficult cases, as a reform option that best suits the traditions of Uzbek civil law and the current institutional potential.

References

Gray J.C. The Rule Against Perpetuities. 4th edn. – Boston: Little, Brown, 1942. – P. 191. (Gray J.C. Doimiylikka qarshi qoida. 4-nashr. – Boston: Little, Brown, 1942. – B. 191.)

Duke of Norfolk's Case (1682) 3 Ch Cas 1, 22 ER 931. (Norfolk gertsogi ishi (1682) 3 Ch Cas 1, 22 ER 931.)

O'zbekiston Respublikasi Konstitutsiyasi 1992 yil, 36-modda. (Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan 1992, art 36.)

O'zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik Kodeksi 1996 yil (o'zgartirishlar bilan), Oltinchi kitob (1113–1188-moddalar). (Civil Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan 1996 (as amended), Sixth Book (arts 1113–1188).)

Maudsley R.H. The Modern Law of Perpetuities. – London: Butterworths, 1979. – P. 62. (Maudsley R.H. Doimiylik bo'yicha zamonaviy qonun. – London: Butterworths, 1979. – B. 62.)

Law Reform Commission of Nova Scotia. Final Report: The Rule Against Perpetuities. December 2010. – P. 4–5. (Nova Shotlandiya Huquqiy islohotlar komissiyasi. Yakuniy hisobot: Doimiylikka qarshi qoida. Dekabr 2010. – B. 4–5.)

Manitoba Law Reform Commission. Report on the Rules Against Accumulations and Perpetuities. Report No 49. – Winnipeg, 1982. – P. 23. (Manitoba Huquqiy islohotlar komissiyasi. To'planishlar va doimiylikka qarshi qoidalar bo'yicha hisobot. 49-son hisobot. – Vinnipeg, 1982. – B. 23.)

Morris J.H.C., Leach W.B. The Rule Against Perpetuities. 2nd edn. – London: Stevens, 1962. – P. 17–18. (Morris J.H.C., Leach W.B. Doimiylikka qarshi qoida. 2-nashr. – London: Stevens, 1962. – B. 17–18.)

Deech R. Lives in Being Revived // Law Quarterly Review. – 1981. – Vol. 97. – P. 593, 594. (Deech R. Mavjudlik davrlari qayta tiklandi // Huquq choraklik sharhi. – 1981. – 97-jild. – B. 593, 594.)

Emery C. Do We Need a Rule Against Perpetuities? // Modern Law Review. – 1994. – Vol. 57. – P. 602, 603. (Emery C. Bizga doimiylikka qarshi qoida kerakmi? // Zamonaviy huquq sharhi. – 1994. – 57-jild. – B. 602, 603.)

Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 2009 (England and Wales), s 5. (2009 yilgi Doimiylik va to'planish to'g'risidagi qonun (Angliya va Uels), 5-bo'lim.)

The Perpetuities and Accumulations Act 1983 (Manitoba); Law Reform Commission of Ireland. Report on the Rule Against Perpetuities and Cognate Rules. LRC No 62. – Dublin, 2000. (1983 yilgi Doimiylik va to'planish to'g'risidagi qonun (Manitoba); Irlandiya Huquqiy islohotlar komissiyasi. Doimiylikka qarshi qoida va unga aloqador qoidalar bo'yicha hisobot. LRC № 62. – Dublin, 2000.)

Law Reform Commission of Nova Scotia. Final Report: The Rule Against Perpetuities. December 2010. – P. 7–8. (Nova Shotlandiya Huquqiy islohotlar komissiyasi. Yakuniy hisobot. – Dekabr 2010. – B. 7–8.)

O'zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik Kodeksi (4-izoh), 1113-modda. (Civil Code of Uzbekistan (n 4) art 1113.)

O'zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik Kodeksi (4-izoh), 1148-modda. (Civil Code of Uzbekistan (n 4) art 1148.)

O'zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik Kodeksi (4-izoh), 1119-modda. (Civil Code of Uzbekistan (n 4) art 1119.)

O'zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik Kodeksi (4-izoh), 1117-1118-moddalar. (Civil Code of Uzbekistan (n 4) arts 1117–1118.)

O'zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudi Plenumi, 2011 yil 20 iyuldagi 5-son qarori. (Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan, Plenum Decision No 5 of 20 July 2011.)

O'zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudi Plenumi (18-izoh). (Plenum Decision No 5 of 2011 (n 18).)

O'zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudi Plenumi (18-izoh). (Plenum Decision No 5 of 2011 (n 18).)

O'zbekiston Respublikasi Fuqarolik Kodeksi (4-izoh), 1160-modda. (Civil Code of Uzbekistan (n 4) art 1160.)

Rossiya Federatsiyasi Fuqarolik Kodeksi 1994 (Birinchi qism). (Civil Code of the Russian Federation 1994 (Part One), arts 188–189.)

Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB) (Germany), §§ 2100–2146; § 2109. (Germaniya Fuqarolik kodeksi (BGB), §§ 2100–2146; § 2109.)

Qozog'iston Respublikasi Fuqarolik Kodeksi 1994 (Maxsus qism), 1040-moddalar va keyingilari. (Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan 1994 (Special Part), arts 1040 et seq.)

Saskatchewan Law Reform Commission. Proposals Relating to the Rules Against Perpetuities and Accumulations. – Regina, 1987. – P. 1. (Saskachivan Huquqiy islohotlar komissiyasi. Doimiylik va to'planishga qarshi qoidalarga oid takliflar. – Rejayna, 1987. – B. 1.)

Law Reform Commission of Nova Scotia (6-izoh). – P. 29–35. (Nova Scotia Report (n 6). – P. 29–35.)

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Abdullaev Oybek. (2026). The Rule Against Perpetuities and The Case for Its Introduction into The Law of Uzbekistan. European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 6(05), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijmrms-06-05-13