Engineering Resilience in Digitized Financial Infrastructures: Uptime, Volatility, and the Architecture of Systemic Stability

Authors

  • Dr. Sofia Alvarez University of Lisbon, Portugal

Keywords:

Financial resilience, resilience engineering, digital financial infrastructure, systemic risk

Abstract

The increasing digitization of global financial infrastructures has fundamentally transformed the manner in which markets operate, transactions are cleared, and risk is distributed across institutional and technological boundaries. This transformation has yielded unprecedented efficiencies, yet it has also amplified systemic fragilities by introducing new forms of technological dependency, cyber exposure, and nonlinear operational risk. In this context, the concept of resilience engineering has emerged as a critical paradigm for ensuring that financial systems remain operationally viable during periods of extreme market stress and technological disruption. This article develops an extensive theoretical and empirical inquiry into how resilience engineering principles can be systematically embedded within financial infrastructures to ensure uptime, continuity, and functional stability during episodes of volatility. Drawing centrally upon the framework articulated by Dasari (2025), which conceptualizes financial uptime as a socio-technical phenomenon rather than a purely technological metric, the study situates financial resilience at the intersection of engineering design, organizational governance, and market dynamics.

The discussion elaborates how resilience engineering challenges conventional efficiency-driven financial architectures by privileging slack, diversity, and modularity over optimization and scale. While such design principles may appear economically costly in the short term, they are shown to generate long-term systemic value by preventing catastrophic failures and maintaining market trust during periods of instability. The article concludes by arguing that resilience engineering must be institutionalized as a core design philosophy within financial regulation and infrastructure governance if digital finance is to remain sustainable in an era of accelerating volatility.

References

Kaufman, G. G., & Scott, K. E. (2017). Financial market infrastructures and systemic risk. Journal of Financial Stability, 28, 1–15.

Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. Random House.

Dasari, H. (2025). Resilience engineering in financial systems: Strategies for ensuring uptime during volatility. The American Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(7), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue07-06

Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Ashgate.

Boin, A., & van Eeten, M. (2013). The resilient organization. Public Management Review, 15(3), 429–445.

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2021). Principles for operational resilience. Bank for International Settlements.

Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. Basic Books.

Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2015). Managing the unexpected: Sustained performance in a complex world. Wiley.

Mandelbrot, B., & Hudson, R. L. (2004). The misbehavior of markets. Basic Books.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-22

How to Cite

Dr. Sofia Alvarez. (2026). Engineering Resilience in Digitized Financial Infrastructures: Uptime, Volatility, and the Architecture of Systemic Stability. European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 6(01), 38–44. Retrieved from https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms/article/view/3873