Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.55640/eijmrms-05-05-17

Ethological and Cognitive Foundations of Zoo-Symbols in Literary Discourse

Sadokat Toshpulatovna Kuchkorova , Doctoral Student (DSc), Department of French Philology, Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This study examines how animal symbols (zoonyms) in literature reflect both ethological principles and cognitive processes. We combined Tinbergen’s ethological framework with cognitive metaphor theory to analyze French and Uzbek literary passages featuring animal imagery. Each instance of animal symbolism was categorized into one of five motivational bases – instinctive, emotional, archetypal, initiatory, or moral – guiding a cross-cultural comparison. Applying Tinbergen’s four questions (function, phylogeny, mechanism, ontogeny) revealed that many animal metaphors share biological roots (e.g., a universal fear of predators) yet carry culturally specific nuances. The findings indicate that literary zoo-symbols are not arbitrary; they arise from innate animal behaviors interpreted through human cognitive and cultural lenses. Ultimately, the research highlights an integrated ethological–cognitive approach to understanding how animal imagery conveys meaning, offering insights for future cross-cultural literary studies.

Keywords

Zoo-symbols, cognitive metaphor, ethology

References

Hart, K. R., & Long, J. H., Jr. (2011). Animal metaphors and metaphorizing animals: An integrated literary, cognitive, and evolutionary analysis of making and partaking of stories. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0301-6

Kurbanova, M. M. (2024). Revisiting animal idioms: Cultural insights across languages. In Proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference on Innovative Methods of Teaching Foreign Languages, Modern Approaches in the Research of Translation Studies and Philology (pp. 230–235). Tashkent State Transport University. Retrieved from https://transport-research.uz/index.php/rs-conf/article/view/520/479

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20(4), 410–433.

Hugo V. Les misérables. Tome I, II, III, IV. Édition du groupe «Ebooks libres et gratuits » (numérique)

Qodirov, P. (2010). Yulduzli tunlar; Bobur: Tarixiy roman (Selected works, Vol. II). Tashkent: Sharq.

Hoshimov, O. (2016). Ikki eshik orasi. Tashkent: Yangi Asr Avlodi.

Norqobilov, N. (2007). Bo‘ron qo‘pgan kun. Tashkent: Sharq.

Said Ahmad. (1976). Kelinlar qo‘zg‘oloni (Comedy). Tashkent: [Publisher not specified].

Said Ahmad. (1976). Ufq (Trilogy). Tashkent: Adabiyot va San’at Nashriyoti.

Article Statistics

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Sadokat Toshpulatovna Kuchkorova. (2025). Ethological and Cognitive Foundations of Zoo-Symbols in Literary Discourse. European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 5(05), 70–74. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijmrms-05-05-17