Articles | Open Access | DOI: https://doi.org/10.55640/eijmrms-05-02-13

Communicative Argot in Comparative Linguistics

Kurbvanova ShoiraBucho , 1 st year master of Termez Economics and Service University, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article deals with Communicative argot, often known as jargon or cant, is an intriguing field of study in comparative linguistics because it emphasizes the dynamic interaction of language, culture, and social groupings. Communicative argot is a specialized vocabulary and grammatical structures used by distinct social groups to communicate with one another, frequently excluding outsiders. This can encompass jobs, hobbies, subcultures, and even families.

Keywords

Jargon, slang, technical jargon

References

Ayto, J. (1998) The Oxford Dictionary of Modern Slang, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Bucholtz, M. (1999) ‘ “Why be normal?”: language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls’ in Language in Society 28: 203-223

Bucholtz, M. (2001) Word Up: Social Meanings of Slang in California Youth Culture

Chapman, R.L, ed. (1986) New Dictionary of American Slang, New York: Harper and Row

Rzhevsky L.D. 1963 The new idiom, Soviet literature in the Sixties. An international symposium, New York - London, M. Hayward and E.Crowley, 1963: 55-80

Вахитов С.В. 2001 Лекция о русском сленге, Уфа , ВГПУ, 2001

Володарская Э.Ф. 2002 Заимствование как отражение русско-английских контактов, Москва, Российская академия наук, Наука, , 2002: 96-108

Грачёв М.А. 1997 Русское арго, Новгород, НГЛУ, 1997

Гуц Е.Н. 1997 Ненормативная лексика в словарном запасе подростка, “Городская разговорная речь и проблемы её изучения”, Омск, ОмГУ, 1997: 72-80

Даль В. 1982 Толковый словарь живого великорусского языка, Москва, Русский язык, 1982

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Kurbvanova ShoiraBucho. (2025). Communicative Argot in Comparative Linguistics. European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 5(02), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijmrms-05-02-13