Article explores Article the dynamic interplay between pleasure and stability within the framework of hedonistic games and their associated theories. This study aims to investigate how pleasure-driven motivations impact the stability of strategic interactions and decision-making processes in various game-theoretic models. By analyzing key concepts and theoretical frameworks, the research delves into how hedonistic preferences influence individual and collective behavior, and how these influences affect overall system stability.

The study employs a multi-disciplinary approach, integrating insights from game theory, psychology, and behavioral economics. It examines both classical and contemporary models of hedonistic games, focusing on their implications for stability in different contexts. Through a combination of theoretical analysis and empirical case studies, the research highlights how pleasure-seeking behaviors can lead to equilibrium or instability, depending on the underlying game dynamics and the structure of incentives.

Key findings suggest that while pleasure-driven motivations can enhance individual satisfaction and engagement, they can also introduce complexities that challenge the stability of strategic interactions. The research identifies conditions under which pleasure-seeking behaviors contribute to stable outcomes and those where they lead to equilibrium disruptions. This nuanced understanding of the intersection between pleasure and stability provides valuable insights for designing systems and strategies that effectively balance pleasure-driven incentives with stability objectives.

Hedonic games, pleasure, stability

Jos ́eAlcaldeandAntonioRomero-Medina.Coalitionformationandstability.

Social Choice and Welfare, 27(2):365–375, 2006.

Haris Aziz, Felix Brandt, and Hans Georg Seedig. Computing desirable partitions in additively separable hedonic games. Artificial Intelligence, 195:316 –334, 2013.

Haris Aziz, Felix Brandt, and Paul Harrenstein. Fractional hedonic games. In AAMAS, pages 5–12. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Mul-tiagent Systems, 2014.

Harris Aziz and Rahul Savani. Handbook of computational social choice, chap-ter 15, pages 356–376. Cambridge University Press, 2016.

CoralioBallester. NP-completeness in hedonic games. Games and Economic Behavior, 49(1):1 –30, 2004.

7. Jean-Claude Bermond, Augustin Chaintreau, Guillaume Ducoffe, and Dorian Mazauric. How long does it take for all users in a social network to choose their communities? Discrete Applied Mathematics, 270:37–57, 2019.

Anna Bogomolnaia and Matthew O. Jackson. The stability of hedonic coalition structures. Games and Economic Behavior, 38(2):201–230, 2002.

FelixBrandt,MartinBullinger,andAna ̈elleWilczynski.Reachingindividually stable coalition structures in hedonic games. In AAAI, 2021.

SiminaBrˆanzei and Kate Larson. Social distance games. In Twenty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011.