Articles | Open Access |

The Role of Organizational Culture and Workspaces in Research and Commercialization Outcomes

Sophia Sun , Department of Strategic Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

Abstract

The work environment plays a pivotal role in shaping the productivity and outcomes of research and commercialization activities, particularly in innovation-driven sectors. This study explores the impact of various work environment factors—such as organizational culture, physical space, collaboration, and leadership—on research output and the commercialization of new technologies and products. By analyzing data from universities, research institutes, and private companies, the research examines how these factors influence not only the quality of research but also its potential to be commercialized successfully. The findings suggest that a conducive work environment, marked by open communication, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and supportive leadership, significantly enhances both the efficiency of research and the success rate of commercialization efforts. The paper concludes by offering recommendations for organizations looking to foster an environment that enhances research productivity and commercialization outcomes.

Keywords

Work Environment, Research and Development, Commercialization

References

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.

Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-30.

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.

Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.

Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press.

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Westview Press.

O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present, and Future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338.

Drucker, P. F. (1993). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles. HarperBusiness.

Bessant, J., & Tidd, J. (2007). Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Managing Ideas, Organizations, and Regions. Wiley.

Katz, J. A., & Green, R. P. (2009). Entrepreneurial Small Business. McGraw-Hill.

Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press.

Jassawalla, A. R., & Sashittal, H. C. (2002). Cultures that facilitate innovation and new product development. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 42-54.

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122.

Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural Inertia and Organizational Change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149-164.

Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. Pinter Publishers.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Sophia Sun. (2025). The Role of Organizational Culture and Workspaces in Research and Commercialization Outcomes. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals, 5(04), 1–6. Retrieved from https://eipublication.com/index.php/jsshrf/article/view/2715