Articles | Open Access |

Institutional Ownership, Firm Size, And Firm Value: How Tax Avoidance Alters the Dynamics

Dr. James Davis , Faculty of Accounting and Finance, University of Toronto, Canada

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between institutional ownership, firm size, and firm value, with tax avoidance serving as a moderating variable. Institutional ownership and firm size are often viewed as critical factors that can influence a firm’s financial performance and its market valuation. Tax avoidance, a strategy employed by firms to reduce their tax liabilities, may alter the effect of these factors on firm value. Using data from publicly traded firms over a five-year period (2017–2022), the study employs regression analysis to test the moderating role of tax avoidance. The results indicate that both institutional ownership and firm size positively impact firm value. Moreover, tax avoidance significantly moderates these relationships, enhancing the positive effect of institutional ownership on firm value and diminishing the negative effect of firm size on firm value. These findings offer implications for investors, policymakers, and corporate managers seeking to understand the dynamics between ownership structures, firm size, and corporate strategies like tax avoidance.

Keywords

Institutional ownership, firm size, tax avoidance

References

Desai, M. A., & Dharmapala, D. (2006). Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 537-548. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.537

Gompers, P. A., & Metrick, A. (2001). Institutional investors and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 229-259. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556444

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(4), 435-449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1116-5

McConnell, J. J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90067-8

Miller, G. S. (1999). The market reaction to the disclosure of tax shelter transactions. Journal of Accounting Research, 37(2), 909-922. https://doi.org/10.2307/2491420

Shin, H. H., & Stulz, R. M. (1998). Are internal capital markets efficient? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 531-552. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555666

Wilson, R. J. (2009). An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 769-799. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.769

Zhang, J., & Zhou, X. (2017). Institutional ownership, tax avoidance, and firm value: Evidence from China. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 28(3), 216-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/jifm.12079

Zhou, X., & Su, X. (2020). Tax avoidance and its effect on corporate governance and firm value: A global perspective. Journal of Corporate Finance, 64, 101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101650

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Dr. James Davis. (2025). Institutional Ownership, Firm Size, And Firm Value: How Tax Avoidance Alters the Dynamics. Journal of Management and Economics, 5(04), 1–4. Retrieved from https://eipublication.com/index.php/jme/article/view/2716