This article explores the cognitive and pragmatic features of paremias in English and Uzbek languages. Paremias are expressions containing wisdom and cultural knowledge that are often used to convey important societal values and norms. By analyzing the cognitive and pragmatic aspects of these expressions in both languages, we aim to uncover the similarities and differences in how wisdom and cultural knowledge are encoded and transmitted through paremias. This comparative study sheds light on the role of paremias in shaping individual cognition and guiding interpersonal communication in two distinct linguistic and cultural contexts.

Paremias, Cognitive features, Pragmatic features

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge University Press.

Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame semantics. Linguistics in the Morning Calm, 2, 111-137.

Tavakoli, P., & Alemi, M. (2017). The pragmatic and cognitive functions of proverbs. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 49-62.

Mieder, W. (2004). Proverbs: A Handbook. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge University Press.

Yu, N. (1998). The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: A Perspective from Chinese. John Benjamins Publishing.

Tirkkonen-Condit, S. (2004). The Role of Translation in the Development of Cognitive Linguistics. In Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (pp. 129-142). Mouton de Gruyter.

Shokirova, M., & Razakova, S. (2018). Pragmatic Features of Uzbek Proverbs. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(2), 1-8.

Yunusova, G. D. (2023). On the potential for enhancement of tashkent’s tourism opportunities. International Journal of Advance Scientific Research, 3(03), 35-39.

Sabirova, D. (2016). The Role of Proverbs in Shaping Cultural Identity: A Case Study of Uzbek Proverbs. European Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics Studies, 2(1), 18-25.