Improving the Methodology for Developing Operational and Technological Competence Among Engineering Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-03-63Keywords:
Engineering education, operational and technological competence, pedagogical methodologyAbstract
The development of operational and technological competence represents an essential objective of contemporary engineering education, particularly in response to the increasing complexity of industrial equipment, digital production systems, and professional engineering activities. This article examines methodological approaches to improving the development of operational and technological competence among engineering students through the integration of competency-based education, experiential learning, digital simulation, and professionally oriented practical training. The study proposes an integrated methodological framework connecting theoretical instruction with authentic engineering tasks, simulation-based activities, laboratory practice, reflective assessment, and formative feedback. Particular attention is devoted to the development of measurable competence indicators and the alignment of learning outcomes with professional engineering requirements. The analytical findings suggest that a coordinated combination of practice-oriented instruction, digital learning environments, and performance-based assessment provides a theoretically grounded approach to strengthening students’ readiness for engineering practice. The proposed framework offers a foundation for curriculum improvement and subsequent experimental validation in higher engineering education institutions.
References
ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2025–2026 [Electronic resource]. – Baltimore: ABET, 2025. – URL: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2025-2026/ (accessed: 22.10.2026).
Crawley E. F., Malmqvist J., Östlund S., Brodeur D. R., Edström K. Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. – 2nd ed. – Cham: Springer, 2014. – 311 p. – DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9.
Kolb D. A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. – Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1984. – 256 p.
Biggs J., Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. – 4th ed. – Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2011. – 389 p.
Prince M. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research // Journal of Engineering Education. – 2004. – Vol. 93, No. 3. – P. 223–231. – DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x.
Freeman S., Eddy S. L., McDonough M., Smith M. K., Okoroafor N., Jordt H., Wenderoth M. P. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. – 2014. – Vol. 111, No. 23. – P. 8410–8415. – DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
Hmelo-Silver C. E. Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? // Educational Psychology Review. – 2004. – Vol. 16, No. 3. – P. 235–266. – DOI: 10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
de Jong T., Linn M. C., Zacharia Z. C. Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering Education // Science. – 2013. – Vol. 340, No. 6130. – P. 305–308. – DOI: 10.1126/science.1230579.
Ma J., Nickerson J. V. Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review // ACM Computing Surveys. – 2006. – Vol. 38, No. 3. – Art. 7. – DOI: 10.1145/1132960.1132961.
Sitzmann T. A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games // Personnel Psychology. – 2011. – Vol. 64, No. 2. – P. 489–528. – DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01190.x.
Felder R. M., Brent R. Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. – San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2016. – 336 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rizayeva Shahnoza Ashurovna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Individual articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Licence: CC-BY 4.0.
