Theoretical and Methodological Foundations of Assessing Prospective Biology Teachers’ Quasi-Professional Activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-03-61Keywords:
Prospective biology teachers, quasi-professional activities, professional competenceAbstract
The assessment of prospective biology teachers’ quasi-professional activities represents an important component of improving professional teacher preparation in higher education. Contemporary science education requires future teachers to demonstrate not only biological knowledge but also pedagogical reasoning, scientific inquiry skills, instructional planning abilities, and competence in evaluating students’ learning outcomes. This study examines the theoretical and methodological foundations of assessing quasi-professional activities and explores the possibilities of adapting international educational frameworks to the professional preparation of biology teachers. The research employs qualitative content analysis of scientific publications, assessment theories, and internationally recognized educational frameworks, including the OECD PISA 2025 Science Framework and the UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. The findings identify the principal components of quasi-professional performance and substantiate a competency-oriented assessment approach incorporating biological content knowledge, methodological decision-making, scientific inquiry, instructional communication, and reflective evaluation. Particular attention is given to performance-based assessment, analytical rubrics, authentic pedagogical situations, and the validity of assessment procedures. An integrated conceptual assessment framework is proposed to support the systematic evaluation of prospective biology teachers’ professional readiness. The study concludes that internationally informed assessment practices should be adapted to the requirements of teacher education and verified through empirical investigation before their broader implementation.
References
Shulman L. S. Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform // Harvard Educational Review. — 1987. — Vol. 57, No. 1. — P. 1–23. — DOI: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
Grossman P., Hammerness K., McDonald M. Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education // Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice. — 2009. — Vol. 15, No. 2. — P. 273–289. — DOI: 10.1080/13540600902875340.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. PISA 2025 Science Framework [Electronic resource]. — Paris: OECD. — URL: https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/ (date of access: 31.10.2026).
UNESCO. UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. Version 3. — Paris: UNESCO, 2018. — 68 p. — ISBN 978-92-3-100285-4. — URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265721 (date of access: 31.10.2026).
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. — Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association, 2014.
Messick S. Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning // American Psychologist. — 1995. — Vol. 50, No. 9. — P. 741–749.
Brookhart S. M. How to Create and Use Rubrics for Formative Assessment and Grading. — Alexandria, VA: ASCD, 2013. — 160 p. — ISBN 978-1-4166-1507-1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Niyozova Shahlo Abdusaitovna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Individual articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Licence: CC-BY 4.0.