Pedagogical Modeling and Software-Methodological Support for Developing Students’ Practical Programming Competencies Through Amaliylab
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-03-58Keywords:
Practical programming competencies, structural-functional pedagogical model, adaptive tasksAbstract
This study substantiates a structural-functional pedagogical model and software-methodological support for developing university students’ practical programming competencies using AmaliyLab. The model integrates goal setting, content design, individualized practical tasks, instructional feedback, learning-process monitoring and reflective evaluation. Its pedagogical operation follows a cycle of initial diagnosis, selection of tasks at an appropriate difficulty level, independent programming, assessment of performance, differentiated support and subsequent task adjustment. A quasi-experimental pedagogical study conducted during the 2024–2025 and 2025–2026 academic years at Fergana State University, Gulistan State University and Karshi State University involved 307 students in Programming fundamentals (experimental group, n=153; control group, n=154). At baseline, the three-level competency distributions were comparable (χ²=0.0023; p≈0.9989). The proportion of students achieving medium or high competency increased from 41.18% to 77.78% in the experimental group and from 40.91% to 62.99% in the control group. The final distributions differed significantly (χ²=23.4514, df=2, p≈0.0000081; Cramér’s V≈0.2764). These aggregate findings support the pedagogical promise of the AmaliyLab-supported approach, while not by themselves establishing an isolated causal effect of the software.
References
Vuorikari R., Kluzer S., Punie Y. DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Publications Office of the European Union, 2022.
Redecker C. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union, 2017.
Biggs J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 1996, 32(3), 347–364.
Kolb D. A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall, 1984.
Anderson L. W., Krathwohl D. R. (eds.). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. Longman, 2001.
Mishra P., Koehler M. J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 2006, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Siemens G. Learning analytics: The emergence of a discipline. American Behavioral Scientist, 2013, 57(10), 1380–1400.
Branch R. M. Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer, 2009.
Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. PF-5847 of 08 October 2019, on the Concept for the Development of Higher Education until 2030.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sulaymanov Zulqaynar Rajabali o‘g‘li

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Individual articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Licence: CC-BY 4.0.