Methodology for Diagnosing the Professional Readiness of Future Physical Education Teachers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-06-20

Keywords:

Physical education, future teacher, professional readiness

Abstract

This article analyzes the scientific and theoretical foundations and the practical methodology for diagnosing the professional readiness of future physical education teachers. It examines the essence of the concept of professional readiness, its five structural components, and the principles, criteria, indicators, and levels of diagnosis. A diagnostic methodology based on the integrated use of questionnaires, testing, observation, interviews, expert evaluation, and the pedagogical experiment is proposed. The results make it possible to objectively assess the preparedness of future specialists and to improve the educational process.

References

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Education.” Tashkent, 2020.

Abdullayeva B.S. Foundations of Pedagogical Diagnostics. Tashkent: Fan, 2019. 184 p.

Slastenin V.A., Isaev I.F., Shiyanov E.N. Pedagogy. Moscow: Akademiya, 2017. 608 p.

Markova A.K. The Psychology of Professionalism. Moscow: Znanie, 1996. 308 p.

Dyachenko M.I., Kandybovich L.A. Psychological Problems of Readiness for Activity. Minsk: BSU, 1976. 176 p.

Ingenkamp K. Pedagogical Diagnostics. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1991. 240 p.

Bespalko V.P. Components of Pedagogical Technology. Moscow: Pedagogika, 1989. 192 p.

Zagvyazinsky V.I. Methodology and Methods of Psychological-Pedagogical Research. Moscow: Akademiya, 2012. 208 p.

Goncharuk A.Yu. Diagnostics of the Professional Readiness of Future Teachers. Moscow, 2016.

Xolikov A. Forming the Professional Competence of Future Teachers. Tashkent: TSPU, 2018.

Usmonxoʻjayev T.S., Meliyev X.A. Theory and Methodology of Physical Education. Tashkent: Lider Press, 2021.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

Saidganiev Saidakhmad Oybek ugli. (2026). Methodology for Diagnosing the Professional Readiness of Future Physical Education Teachers. European International Journal of Pedagogics, 6(06), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-06-20