A Didactic Model for Forming Mathematical Competence in Primary Education Through Geometric Concepts

Authors

  • Gadayev Doniyor Rajabovich Lecturer at Jizzakh State Pedagogical University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-02-36

Keywords:

Primary mathematics education, mathematical competence, geometry

Abstract

The competence-based transformation of primary mathematics education requires instructional models that connect conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, reasoning, and communication within meaningful learning situations. Geometry provides a particularly powerful pathway for competence formation because it naturally integrates visualisation, measurement, spatial reasoning, and argumentation, while also supporting the development of mathematical language. This article proposes and justifies a didactic model for forming mathematical competence in primary education through fundamental geometric concepts. The model is grounded in documentary analysis of international frameworks that emphasise mathematical reasoning and application, including the cognitive domain logic of TIMSS (knowing, applying, reasoning) and the mathematical literacy orientation of PISA, alongside research on developmental progressions in geometric thinking (notably the van Hiele theory). The model is described as a coherent system linking learning outcomes, content selection, instructional design, formative assessment, and feedback loops. It specifies how core geometric ideas—point, line, segment, ray, angle, plane figures, symmetry, perimeter, area, and spatial relationships—can function as “conceptual organisers” for broader mathematical competence. The proposed design foregrounds representational transitions (from concrete manipulation to schematic drawings and symbolic notation), discourse routines, and criterion-referenced assessment. The article argues that the model is feasible for teacher education and school practice because it offers operational design principles for lesson planning, task construction, and assessment. It also defines evaluation indicators for monitoring competence growth, including shifts in students’ reasoning quality, use of geometric language, and ability to model real situations with geometric representations.

References

Mullis I.V.S., Martin M.O., von Davier M. (eds.). TIMSS 2023 Assessment Frameworks. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, 2021. URL: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2023/frameworks/index.html (accessed: 05.03.2026).

Philpot R., Martin M.O., Mullis I.V.S. TIMSS 2023 Mathematics Framework. Boston College, TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, 2021. URL: https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2023/frameworks/pdf/T23_Frameworks_Ch1_Mathematics.pdf (accessed: 05.03.2026).

OECD. PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework (web portal). OECD, 2022. URL: https://pisa2022-maths.oecd.org/ca/index.html (accessed: 05.03.2026).

OECD. PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023. URL: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/08/pisa-2022-assessment-and-analytical-framework_a124aec8/dfe0bf9c-en.pdf (accessed: 05.03.2026).

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (PSSM). Reston, VA: NCTM, 2000. URL: https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Principles-and-Standards/ (accessed: 05.03.2026).

Vojkuvkova I. The van Hiele Model of Geometric Thinking // WDS’12 Proceedings of Contributed Papers. Prague: Charles University, 2012. P. 72–75. URL: https://www.mff.cuni.cz/veda/konference/wds/proc/pdf12/WDS12_112_m8_Vojkuvkova.pdf (accessed: 05.03.2026).

Mayberry J. The van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thought in Undergraduate Preservice Teachers // Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 1983. Vol. 14(1). P. 58–69. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/748797 (accessed: 05.03.2026).

Tan T.H., Cheng Y.H. Understanding the Primary School Students’ van Hiele Levels of Geometry Thinking in Learning Shapes // Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2015. Vol. 11(6). P. 1257–1276. URL: https://www.ejmste.com/download/understanding-the-primary-school-students-van-hiele-levels-of-geometry-thinking-in-learning-shapes-4409.pdf (accessed: 05.03.2026).

Abdullah A.H., Zakaria E. The Effects of Van Hiele’s Phases of Learning Geometry on Students’ Levels of Geometric Thinking // Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013. Vol. 102. P. 251–260. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813042766 (accessed: 05.03.2026).

TIMSS 2023. Content and Cognitive Domains (Grade 4) — Mathematics subdomains. 2025. URL: https://timss2023.org/results/grade-4-math-subdomains/ (accessed: 05.03.2026).

Hamzeh M.A.W.H. Levels of Geometric Thinking According to van Hiele’s Model for Classroom Teacher Students // International Digital Organization for Scientific Publications. 2017. URL: https://www.idpublications.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Full-paper-LEVELS-OF-GEOMETRIC-THINKING-ACCORDING-TO-VAN-HIELES-MODEL-FOR-CLASSROOM.pdf (accessed: 05.03.2026).

ILSA Gateway. TIMSS: Cognitive Domains (Knowing, Applying, Reasoning) — Framework summary. 2023. URL: https://ilsa-gateway.org/studies/frameworks/1279 (accessed: 05.03.2026).

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Gadayev Doniyor Rajabovich. (2026). A Didactic Model for Forming Mathematical Competence in Primary Education Through Geometric Concepts. European International Journal of Pedagogics, 6(02), 167–171. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-02-36