Design, Practice, And Anxiety Reduction: A Meta-Analysis Of STEM-Oriented Interventions for Preservice Primary Teachers’ Foreign Language Speaking Confidence
Keywords:
speaking anxiety, preservice teachers, STEM design, intervention studiesAbstract
Foreign language speaking anxiety remains a persistent barrier to oral performance, participation, and communicative development across second and foreign language settings, with consequences that extend from learners’ moment-to-moment classroom engagement to their long-term willingness to use the target language in professional contexts (Ansari, 2015; Bailey, 2020; Bashori et al., 2022). For preservice primary teachers, the stakes are amplified: they are expected to model communication, facilitate interaction, and create emotionally safe learning environments, yet many teacher candidates report anxiety when speaking in a foreign language and uncertainty about how to design learning tasks that support confident oral production. In parallel, teacher education has intensified attention to STEM-oriented design practices, which promote iterative problem-solving, collaboration, and authentic communication—conditions that may indirectly reshape affective barriers and strengthen self-efficacy beliefs related to performance (Bandura, 1997; Aslan-Tutak et al., 2017; DiFrancesca et al., 2014). This article develops a publication-ready meta-analytic synthesis focused on intervention studies that address speaking anxiety and speaking performance, while theoretically integrating mechanisms from STEM design-based teacher education and self-efficacy theory. Using established meta-analysis principles and methodological guidance, the study constructs an interpretive quantitative-qualitative synthesis pathway: defining eligibility boundaries, coding intervention characteristics, and interpreting patterns of effects and heterogeneity through a mechanism-focused lens (Arthur Jr. et al., 2001; Desimone, 2009; Bangert-Drowns et al., 2004). The results are presented as a descriptive meta-analytic narrative that traces how particular intervention logics—flipped learning, web-based speaking practice, remote tasks, gamified language learning, voice-based interaction, dynamic assessment, and embodied methods—operate as anxiety-reduction pathways, and how STEM-oriented design practice in preservice preparation may amplify those pathways by providing mastery experiences, peer collaboration, and professional identity development (Abdullah et al., 2021; Abuhussein et al., 2023; Ali, 2022; Anton, 2009; Blackmore et al., 2018). The discussion advances a practical framework for designing preservice programs that deliberately connect STEM design pedagogy and language speaking interventions to reduce anxiety and strengthen speaking confidence, while acknowledging limitations of evidence transfer across populations and the methodological constraints typical of intervention research (Desimone, 2009; Becker & Park, 2011).
References
Abdullah, M., Hussin, S., & Ismail, K. (2021). Does flipped classroom model affect EFL learners’ anxiety in English speaking performance? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(1), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i01.16955
Abuhussein, H. F., Qassrawi, R. M., & Shaath, S. (2023). Utilizing remote speaking tasks for tackling foreign language anxiety. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2238150. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2238150
Akdağ-Çimen, B., & Çeşme, H. (2022). Effect of TPR and CLT on young EFL learners’ speaking anxiety, oral proficiency, and vocabulary learning. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 19(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.56040/akce1924
Aktaş, E. (2023). The effect of Web 2.0 based technology applications on speaking skills and speaking anxiety in teaching Turkish as a foreign language: Voki example. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1183037. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1183037
Akar, H., & Yadigaroğlu, M. (2021). The effect of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) based activities on the 5th grade students’ association of the concepts in the substance and change unit with daily life. Journal of Erzincan University Faculty of Education, 23(1), 57–81. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.656886
Ali, A. D. (2022). Effects of a gamified MALL application on developing EFL preparatory school students’ speaking enjoyment and reducing speaking anxiety. CDELT Occasional Papers in the Development of English Education, 78(1), 241–296. https://doi.org/10.21608/opde.2022.249943
Am, M. A., Hadi, S., Istiyono, E., & Retnawati, H. (2023). Does differentiated instruction affect learning outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(5), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202322021
Amiryousefi, M. (2019). The incorporation of flipped learning into conventional classes to enhance EFL learners’ L2 speaking, L2 listening, and engagement. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1394307
Ansari, M. S. (2015). Speaking anxiety in ESL/EFL classrooms: A holistic approach and practical study. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(4), 38–46.
Anton, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign Language Annals, 42(3), 576–598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01030.x
Arthur Jr., W., Bennett, W., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2001). Conducting meta-analysis using SAS. Psychology Press.
Aslan-Tutak, F., Akaygun, S., & Tezsezen, S. (2017). Collaboratively learning to teach STEM: Change in participating pre-service teachers’ awareness of STEM. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32(4), 794–816. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2017027115
Aydın, M. (2019). The effects of NLP-based activities on students' foreign language speaking anxiety in English teaching (Publication No. 585478) [Master’s thesis, Erciyes University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
Ayaz, E., & Sarıkaya, R. (2019). The effect of engineering design-based science teaching on the perceptions of classroom teacher candidates towards STEM disciplines. International Journal of Progressive Education, 15(3), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2019.193.2
Aykac, M., & Cetinkaya, G. (2013). The effect of creative drama activities on preservice Turkish language teachers’ speaking skills. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(9), 671–682.
Azizimajd, H. (2023). Investigating the impacts of voice-based student-chatbot interactions in the classroom on EFL learners' oral fluency and foreign language speaking anxiety. Technology Assisted Language Education, 1(2), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.22126/tale.2023.2732
Bailey, K. M. (2020). Teaching listening and speaking in second and foreign language contexts. Bloomsbury Academic.
Bakırcı, H., & Karışan, D. (2018). Investigating the pre-service primary school, mathematics and science teachers' STEM awareness. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(1), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i1.2807
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29–58. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001029
Bashori, M., van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2022). Web-based language learning and speaking anxiety. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 1058–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1770293
Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12(5), 23–37.
Berisha, F., & Vula, E. (2021). Developing preservice teachers’ STEM understanding and pedagogical practices. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.585075
Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7), 102–112.
Blackmore, K., Howard, C., & Kington, A. (2018). Trainee teachers’ experience of primary science teaching, and the perceived impact on their developing professional identity. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1462330
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35.
Charette, R. N. (2015). STEM sense and nonsense. Educational Leadership, 72(4), 79–83.
Depaepe, F., & König, J. (2018). General pedagogical knowledge, self-efficacy and instructional practice: Disentangling their relationship in pre-service teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.10.003
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
DiFrancesca, D., Lee, C., & McIntyre, E. (2014). Where is the “E” in STEM for young children? Engineering design education in an elementary teacher preparation program. Issues in Teacher Education, 23(1), 49–64.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. Sofia M. Kallström, Dr. Mehmet A. Yılmaz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Individual articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Licence: CC-BY 4.0.