Integrative Model Of Physics Education In The Digital Environment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-02-12

Keywords:

Virtual laboratory, learning management system (LMS), augmented and virtual reality

Abstract

The analysis shows that the proposed model can serve as a methodologically grounded and systematic conceptual solution for visualizing abstract physical processes, improving the effectiveness of teaching in resource-limited laboratory conditions, and ensuring competency-based learning outcomes. The model interprets digital tools not as isolated add-ons, but as an integrated instructional management system combining didactic mechanisms with assessment and learning analytics.

References

Abdulwahed, M., & Nagy, Z. K. (2009). Applying Kolb's experiential learning cycle for laboratory education. Journal of Engineering Education, 98 (3), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01025.x

Brinson, J. R. (2015). Learning outcome achievement in non-traditional (virtual and remote) versus traditional laboratories: A review of the empirical research. Computers & Education, 87, 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.003

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction (4th ed.). Wiley.

De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science education. Science, 340 (6130), 305-308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579

Freeman, S., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111 (23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Gameage, D., Perera, I., & Fernando, S. (2020). Moodle and LMS-based learning analytics: A systematic review. IEEE Access, 8, 141568-141592. https://doi.org/10.1109/ ACCESS.2020.3012012

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. Routledge.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16 (3), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR. 0000034022.16470.f3

Ibanez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2018.05.002

Downloads

Published

2026-02-18

How to Cite

Khalikov Kurbanbay Tuychievich. (2026). Integrative Model Of Physics Education In The Digital Environment. European International Journal of Pedagogics, 6(02), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-02-12