The Concept of Logical Thinking and Its Role in The Problem-Solving Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-01-04Keywords:
Logical thinking, reasoning, problem solving, inferenceAbstract
Logical thinking is commonly treated as a set of formal operations (analysis, inference, justification) and, at the same time, as a culturally mediated cognitive practice shaped by education, language, and domain experience. This article examines logical thinking as a functional system that supports problem solving by stabilizing reasoning under uncertainty, constraining intuitive responses, and enabling reliable verification of solutions. Using an integrative literature-based method (conceptual synthesis of cognitive psychology, educational theory, and problem-solving research), the study proposes a process model in which logical thinking contributes at each stage of problem solving: constructing a representation, selecting a strategy, executing inference, and validating outcomes. The results clarify how logical operations interact with heuristics, working memory, and metacognition, and why logical competence is not reducible to “knowing rules” but requires transfer-sensitive practice and reflective control. The discussion highlights instructional implications for developing learners’ reasoning: explicit argumentation routines, structured problem representation, and feedback that targets inferential steps rather than final answers. The conclusion argues that logical thinking functions as a quality-control mechanism in problem solving, improving accuracy, explainability, and transfer across tasks.
References
Пойа Д. Как решать задачу: новое понимание математического метода / пер. с англ. М.: Наука, 1975. 224 с.
Dewey J. How We Think. Boston: D. C. Heath and Company, 1910. 300 p.
Newell A., Simon H. A. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1972. 920 p.
Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. 499 p.
Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases // Science. 1974. Vol. 185, no. 4157. P. 1124–1131.
Stanovich K. E. Rationality and the Reflective Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. 336 p.
Evans J. St. B. T., Stanovich K. E. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013. Vol. 8, no. 3. P. 223–241.
Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning // Cognitive Science. 1988. Vol. 12, no. 2. P. 257–285.
Sweller J., van Merriënboer J. J. G., Paas F. G. W. C. Cognitive architecture and instructional design // Educational Psychology Review. 1998. Vol. 10, no. 3. P. 251–296.
Vygotsky L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978. 159 p.
Piaget J. The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge, 1950. 182 p.
Bransford J. D., Brown A. L., Cocking R. R. (eds.) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000. 374 p.
Schoenfeld A. H. Mathematical Problem Solving. Orlando: Academic Press, 1985. 409 p.
Chi M. T. H., Glaser R. Problem solving ability // Sternberg R. J. (ed.) Human Abilities: An Information-Processing Approach. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1985. P. 227–257.
Ericsson K. A., Kintsch W. Long-term working memory // Psychological Review. 1995. Vol. 102, no. 2. P. 211–245.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Madirimova Momajon Raximboyevna

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Individual articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Licence: CC-BY 4.0.