The Concept of Logical Thinking and Its Role in The Problem-Solving Process

Authors

  • Madirimova Momajon Raximboyevna Senior teacher at Urgench State Pedagogical Institute, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-01-04

Keywords:

Logical thinking, reasoning, problem solving, inference

Abstract

Logical thinking is commonly treated as a set of formal operations (analysis, inference, justification) and, at the same time, as a culturally mediated cognitive practice shaped by education, language, and domain experience. This article examines logical thinking as a functional system that supports problem solving by stabilizing reasoning under uncertainty, constraining intuitive responses, and enabling reliable verification of solutions. Using an integrative literature-based method (conceptual synthesis of cognitive psychology, educational theory, and problem-solving research), the study proposes a process model in which logical thinking contributes at each stage of problem solving: constructing a representation, selecting a strategy, executing inference, and validating outcomes. The results clarify how logical operations interact with heuristics, working memory, and metacognition, and why logical competence is not reducible to “knowing rules” but requires transfer-sensitive practice and reflective control. The discussion highlights instructional implications for developing learners’ reasoning: explicit argumentation routines, structured problem representation, and feedback that targets inferential steps rather than final answers. The conclusion argues that logical thinking functions as a quality-control mechanism in problem solving, improving accuracy, explainability, and transfer across tasks.

References

Пойа Д. Как решать задачу: новое понимание математического метода / пер. с англ. М.: Наука, 1975. 224 с.

Dewey J. How We Think. Boston: D. C. Heath and Company, 1910. 300 p.

Newell A., Simon H. A. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1972. 920 p.

Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. 499 p.

Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases // Science. 1974. Vol. 185, no. 4157. P. 1124–1131.

Stanovich K. E. Rationality and the Reflective Mind. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. 336 p.

Evans J. St. B. T., Stanovich K. E. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate // Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2013. Vol. 8, no. 3. P. 223–241.

Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning // Cognitive Science. 1988. Vol. 12, no. 2. P. 257–285.

Sweller J., van Merriënboer J. J. G., Paas F. G. W. C. Cognitive architecture and instructional design // Educational Psychology Review. 1998. Vol. 10, no. 3. P. 251–296.

Vygotsky L. S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978. 159 p.

Piaget J. The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge, 1950. 182 p.

Bransford J. D., Brown A. L., Cocking R. R. (eds.) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000. 374 p.

Schoenfeld A. H. Mathematical Problem Solving. Orlando: Academic Press, 1985. 409 p.

Chi M. T. H., Glaser R. Problem solving ability // Sternberg R. J. (ed.) Human Abilities: An Information-Processing Approach. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1985. P. 227–257.

Ericsson K. A., Kintsch W. Long-term working memory // Psychological Review. 1995. Vol. 102, no. 2. P. 211–245.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-11

How to Cite

Madirimova Momajon Raximboyevna. (2026). The Concept of Logical Thinking and Its Role in The Problem-Solving Process. European International Journal of Pedagogics, 6(01), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijp-06-01-04