Social Exchange, Organizational Justice, And Work–Life Dynamics: An Integrative Analysis Of Job Satisfaction, Wellbeing, And Employee Performance In Contemporary Organizations

Authors

  • Dr. Alexander M. Kovačević Faculty of Management and Social Sciences, University of Belgrade, Serbia

Keywords:

Organizational justice, Social exchange theory, Work–life balance

Abstract

Organizational environments across the globe are undergoing profound transformations driven by globalization, technological change, demographic shifts, and evolving employee expectations regarding fairness, wellbeing, and work–life balance. Within this context, understanding the mechanisms through which organizational justice, social exchange relationships, and work–life dynamics shape job satisfaction, wellbeing, and employee performance has become an urgent scholarly and practical concern. Drawing exclusively on established theoretical and empirical literature, this study develops an integrative research framework that connects social exchange theory, organizational justice, work–family conflict, work–life balance, emotional intelligence, and employee wellbeing to key organizational outcomes, including job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, commitment, and performance. The article adopts a comprehensive qualitative and conceptual methodology grounded in systematic theoretical synthesis, enabling a deep exploration of causal pathways, mediating mechanisms, and contextual contingencies. The findings suggest that perceptions of fairness and reciprocity embedded in social exchange relationships constitute a foundational mechanism through which organizations influence employee attitudes and behaviors. Job satisfaction and wellbeing consistently emerge as central mediators linking work–life experiences and organizational practices to individual and collective performance outcomes. Furthermore, the analysis highlights the differentiated effects of work–family conflict across occupational groups, genders, and generational cohorts, emphasizing the growing importance of flexible and family-supportive organizational policies. By integrating diverse streams of literature into a unified explanatory model, this article contributes to organizational behavior theory by clarifying how justice-based exchanges and work–life balance jointly shape sustainable performance. The study also offers important implications for managers and policymakers seeking to design humane, equitable, and high-performing workplaces in post-pandemic and future-oriented organizational contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aeknarajindawat, N., & Jermsittiparsert, K. (2020). Does organization justice influence the organization citizenship behavior, job satisfaction & organization outcomes? Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(1), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.5530/srp.2020.1.61

Ahmad, R., Nawaz, M. R., Ishaq, M. I., Khan, M. M., & Ashraf, H. A. (2022). Social exchange theory: Systematic review and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1015921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015921

Arshad, M. A., Arshad, D., & Zakaria, N. (2023). Mediating role of wellbeing among organizational virtuousness, emotional intelligence and job performance in post-pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105895

Berhanu, K. Z. (2023). Mediating role of job satisfaction on the relation between staff development and performance. Cogent Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2207408

Blau, P. M. (2017). Exchange & power. Taylor & Francis.

Colquitt, J., Lepine, J., & Michael, W. (2017). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace. PPI Pulp and Paper International.

Emerson, R. M. (2008). Social exchange theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 335–362.

Fan, P., Ye, L., Yang, S., Song, K., Zhang, H., & Guo, M. (2024). High conflict, high performance? Safety Science, 172, 106403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106403

Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4277352

Greenhaus, J. H., & Collins, K. M. (2003). The relation between work–family balance and quality of life. Journal of Vocational Behavior.

Huo, M. L., & Jiang, Z. (2023). Work–life conflict and job performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 205, 112109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112109

Susanto, P., Hoque, M. E., Jannat, T., Emely, B., Zona, M. A., & Islam, M. A. (2022). Work-life balance, job satisfaction, and job performance of SMEs employees. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.906876

Žiedelis, A., Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė, J., & Urbanavičiūtė, I. (2023). The gendered effect of an overwork climate and high personal standards for work–home conflict during the pandemic. Economic and Industrial Democracy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X231167497

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

How to Cite

Dr. Alexander M. Kovačević. (2026). Social Exchange, Organizational Justice, And Work–Life Dynamics: An Integrative Analysis Of Job Satisfaction, Wellbeing, And Employee Performance In Contemporary Organizations. Journal of Management and Economics, 6(01), 1–5. Retrieved from https://eipublication.com/index.php/jme/article/view/3778