This article focuses on common and different aspects of Internet stylistics in Uzbek and English. Also, the article shows the scientific work done in this regard.  and mostly reliable examples are given.

Along with the great achievements of Uzbek linguistics at the present time, there are still many areas that have not been scientifically researched. In particular, such areas as phonology and morphonology, intonology and textual studies, and semiotics are still not sufficiently studied. Linguistics has a branch known as morphonology, which is sandwiched between the branches such as morphology and phonology. The first science is related to formation and helps to form different meanings.

It is also closely related to phonological forms of morphemes and phonological forms of morphs or individual morphemes. Phonetics and phonology are closely related. « We replace it with the term phonology because phonetics has always been, and should continue to be, the study of the evolution of sounds. » Speech activity is realized through sound or sound system.

A hyperphoneme is not a neutralization of several phonemes, but it can be limited to one phoneme. In later linguistics, paradigmatic neutralization and syntagmatic neutralization are distinguished.

In this work, the author considers various conceptual characteristics of the term as a linguistic concept within the framework of the current state of linguistics.  The author also highlights some issues of the process of terminology formation in domestic and foreign linguistics.  The aim of the study is to identify the distinctive properties of terms in fixed language structures, as well as within the theory of the term field.  The subject of the study is the term as a linguistic unit in its various aspects.

All linguists know that auxiliary words are widely used in both Arabic and Uzbek. This article discusses the meanings of لِ primitive auxiliary in Arabic. Our textbooks do not pay much attention to the meaning of these auxiliary. However, this topic is widely covered in the scientific works of both classical grammarians and modern grammarians. We have tried to summarize all the information in these works and show all the meanings of this primitive auxiliary. To shed more light on this, we have used various sources, such as the following and many other works, including the medieval grammar of Mahmud az-Zamahshari’s “Al-mufassal fin-nahvi”, and Abdul-Qahir al-Jurjani’s “Hundred Factors in Arabic Nahvi”, the famous and one of the modern Lebanese scholars Antoine al-Dahdah’s “Mu’jamul lug’atin-nahvil arabi”, “Al-kamil fin-nahvi vas-sarfi val I’rab” by Ahmad Qabbis, a well-known Syrian linguist, Al-Ardabiyli’s commentary on Az-Zamahshari’s “Alunmuzaj fin-nahvi”, B.M.Grande’s “Arabic Grammar Course in Comparative-Historical Lighting”.