Enhancing Technical Content Comprehension Through CLIL

Authors

  • Nargizoy Mirzaeva Doctor of Philosophy in Philological Sciences, senior teacher of the Andijan State Technical Institute, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-06-06-19

Keywords:

CLIL, technical terminology, content integration

Abstract

The globalized technical sector demands graduates proficient not only in subject matter but also in applying specialized language. The integration of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) offers a promising pedagogical solution to the challenge of developing advanced language skills alongside deep subject knowledge in technical fields. More than 90% of scientific information is currently in English. The CLIL method prepares students for digital English (Digital English Literacy). They will learn to independently use English-language AI tools, online simulations, and international online databases within their subject area.

The primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of CLIL in fostering the interrelation between content comprehension and linguistic competency, specifically focusing on the deep learning of domain-specific vocabulary. A quasi-experimental comparative study will be conducted involving 150 engineering students divided into two groups; a CLIL group exposed to foundational engineering modules taught bilingually, and a control group receiving standard content instruction with passive English exposure. Assessments measured proficiency in two key areas: Conceptual Understanding and Contextual Terminology Accuracy. 

The CLIL methodology explicitly integrated the 4Cs Framework (Content, Communication, Cognition, Culture). Data were analyzed using independent Samples T-tests to compare group performance. 

Results confirm a significant positive impact: the CLIL group demonstrated statistically superior performance in accurately using specialized vocabulary within complex technical explanations compared to the control group. The outcome signifies a successful interrelation where content mastery directly reinforced precise linguistic application.

The research concludes that CLIL is a vital pedagogical mechanism for bridging the gap between knowing facts and articulating professional knowledge. It strongly recommends the integration of subject-specific CLIL frameworks to ensure linguistic competence supports, rather than hinders, engineering mastery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ammon, U. (2012). Linguistic inequality and its effects on participation in scientific discourse and on global knowledge accumulation – With a closer look at the problems of the second-rank language communities. Applied Linguistics Review, 3(2), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0016

Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486999

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-08

How to Cite

Nargizoy Mirzaeva. (2026). Enhancing Technical Content Comprehension Through CLIL. European International Journal of Philological Sciences, 6(06), 79–81. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-06-06-19