Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-05-08-10

Onomatopoeia and Interjections

Mokhidil Sharipova , Researcher of Kokand State University, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This study explores the differences between interjections and onomatopoeic units in English and Uzbek. Though both are expressive linguistic elements, they serve distinct roles in language. Using descriptive and comparative methods, this paper highlights their structural, functional, and semantic distinctions, supported by examples from English and Uzbek. Findings reveal that while interjections primarily express emotion or reaction, onomatopoeic units imitate natural sounds, with clear divergence in form, function, and syntactic behavior. Literary texts also demonstrate that both forms serve to enhance emotion and imagery, though in different stylistic ways.

Keywords

Onomatopoeia, interjections, part of speech

References

Ameka, F. K. (1992). Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics.

Maruszka Eve Marie Meinard, Distinguishing onomatopoeias from interjections Journal of Pragmatics, Volume 76,2015, Pages 150-168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.011.

Sharipova M., Phonetic characteristics of onomatopoeic words in English language Actual problems of humanities and social sciences Vol. 4, Issue 6, 2024.

Sharipov Z. (2025). Typology of borrowings in linguistics. American Journal of Philological Sciences, 5(02), 98–100. https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume05Issue02-28

Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language.

Poe, E. A. (1849). The Bells.

Qodiriy, A. (1926). O‘tkan Kunlar.

G‘ulom, G. (1950). Tanlangan Asarlar.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Mokhidil Sharipova. (2025). Onomatopoeia and Interjections. European International Journal of Philological Sciences, 5(08), 49–51. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-05-08-10