Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-05-06-23

Comparative And Typological Study Of Semantic Categories Inherent In A Noun (Using The Example Of Uzbek And English)

Sarvinoz Alimova Sobirovna , PhD researcher of Samarkand State University, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article provides a comparative-typological analysis of the semantic categories inherent in nouns in Uzbek and English. As a result of the analysis, taking into account typological data, both similarities and differences between languages are revealed. From this perspective, the comparison explains which categories express the semantics of a noun and how they manifest in the languages being studied. This approach not only reveals the differences between the two languages but also contributes to establishing common principles of semantic systems. The research results can be useful in the field of linguistic theory, applied linguistics, and translation.

The concept of semantic category, that is, the types of meanings expressed in language, is considered on the example of lexical units, in particular, nouns. The study examines the following semantic categories.

Keywords

noun, semantic category, comparative-typological analysis

References

Corbet – 1991 – Corbett G. Gender. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. – P. 12.

Huddleston, Pullum – 2002 – Huddleston R., Pullum G. K. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. – P. 477.

Ilyish – 1965 – Ilyish B. The Structure of Modern English. – M., 1965. – P. 40; 87; 89.

Mirtojiyev – 2010 – Mirtojiev M. O‘zbek tili semasiologiyasi. – Toshkent: Mumtoz so‘z, 2010. – 98-b.

Quirk – 1985 – Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. – London: Longman, 1985. – P. 314.

Rahmatullayev – 2006 – Rahmatullayev Sh. Hozirgi o‘zbek adabiy tili. – Toshkent: Universitet, 2006. – 133-b.; 204-b.

Rosenbach – 2014 – Rosenbach A. English Genitive Variation – the State of the Art // English Language and Linguistics. – 2014. – Vol. 18. Iss. 2. – P. 215–262.

Safarov – 2004 – Safarov F. O‘zbek tilida son-miqdor mikromaydoni va uning lisoniy-nutqiy xususiyati. Filologiya fanlari nomzodi ilmiy darajasini olish uchun taqdim etilgan dissertatsiya avtoreferati. – Samarqand, 2004. – 8-bet.

Sayfullayeva – 2009 – Sayfullayeva R.R., Mengliyev B.R., Boqiyeva G.H., Qurbonova M.M., Yunusova Z.Q., Abuzalova M.Q. Hozirgi o‘zbek adabiy tili. – Toshkent: FTM, 2009. – 323-b.

Болдырев – 2015 – Болдырев Н. Н. Антропоцентрическая сущность языка в его функциях, единицах и категориях // Вопросы когнитивной лингвистики. – 2015. – № 1 (42). – С. 9.

Болдырев – 2017 – Болдырев Н. Н. Интерпретирующий фактор языка в познании и коммуникации // Когнитивные исследования языка. – 2017. – Вып. 29. – С. 43.

Исаченко – 1961 – Исаченко А. В. О грамматическом значении // Вопросы языкознания. – 1961. – № 1. – С. 36.

Костромин – 2017 – Костромин А. Б. Классификация неисчисляемых существительных в английском языке // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Теория языка. Семиотика. Семантика. – 2017. – Т.8. № 3. – С. 614–619. URL: http://journals.rudn.ru/semioticssemantics

Стеблин-Каменский – 1974 – Стеблин-Каменский М. И. Спорное в языкознании. – Л.: Учпедгиз, 1974.

Ҳожиев – 2007 – Ҳожиев А. Ўзбек тили сўз ясалиши тизими. – Тошкент: Ўқитувчи, 2007. – 63-б.; 75-б.

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Sarvinoz Alimova Sobirovna. (2025). Comparative And Typological Study Of Semantic Categories Inherent In A Noun (Using The Example Of Uzbek And English). European International Journal of Philological Sciences, 5(06), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.55640/eijps-05-06-23