Formation and Development of The Institution of Mediation in The Socio-Legal Space

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/jsshrf-06-02-15

Keywords:

Mediation, alternative dispute resolution, socio-legal space

Abstract

The article traces the formation and development of mediation as an institution within the socio-legal space, treating it as a phenomenon of dual nature – at once a social practice for the consensual settlement of conflict and a legal institution with its own procedures, professional roles, and enforcement mechanisms. Through institutional, historical-legal, and comparative-legal analysis, the study reconstructs the trajectory along which mediation has moved from informal negotiation practice, professionalised through the alternative dispute resolution movement, toward codified legal form. Particular attention is given to international harmonisation – the UNCITRAL Model Law of 2002, the European Union’s Mediation Directive of 2008, and the Singapore Convention of 2018 – and to national codification in the post-Soviet socio-legal space, where the Russian law of 2010 and the Uzbek law of 2018 gave the procedure statutory footing. It is argued that the durability of the institution rests on the alignment of its social function – access to justice and the restoration of relations – with a legal form that renders mediated agreements predictable and, increasingly, enforceable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin Books.

Moore, C. W. (2014). The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Hopt, K. J., & Steffek, F. (Eds.). (2013). Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

UNCITRAL. (2002). UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Conciliation. New York: United Nations (amended in 2018 as the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Mediation and International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation).

Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters. Official Journal of the European Union, L 136, 24.5.2008, pp. 3–8.

Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 193-FZ of 27 July 2010 “On the Alternative Procedure for the Settlement of Disputes with the Participation of an Intermediary (Mediation Procedure)” (in force from 1 January 2011).

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan No. ZRU-482 of 3 July 2018 “On Mediation” (in force from 1 January 2019).

United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation (Singapore Convention on Mediation) (2018). New York: United Nations (opened for signature 7 August 2019; entered into force 12 September 2020).

Downloads

Published

2026-02-28

How to Cite

Abdullaev Bakhodir Akhmedovich. (2026). Formation and Development of The Institution of Mediation in The Socio-Legal Space. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals, 6(02), 76–80. https://doi.org/10.55640/jsshrf-06-02-15