Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus Tuberosus L.): A Comprehensive Review of Cultivation Technology and Its Significance as A Medicinal and Functional Food Plant
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/jsshrf-06-05-13Keywords:
Jerusalem artichoke, Helianthus tuberosus, prebioticAbstract
Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) is a hardy perennial tuberous plant of the Asteraceae family that has attracted renewed scientific and industrial attention as a multipurpose crop combining low-input cultivation requirements with exceptional functional-food and medicinal value. This review synthesizes evidence from 25 international peer-reviewed sources published between 2007 and 2024, with the dual objective of summarizing modern cultivation technology and elucidating the plant’s significance as a source of bioactive compounds for human health.
The review demonstrates that Jerusalem artichoke produces tuber yields of 30–80 t/ha with minimal fertilizer input (60–90 kg N/ha) and exhibits strong tolerance to drought, frost (–30 °C), and pest pressure. Tubers contain 14–20% inulin on a fresh-weight basis (60–80% of dry matter), 1–3% protein with a complete essential amino acid profile, substantial potassium and iron, and bioactive phenolics including chlorogenic and caffeic acids. Inulin acts as a non-digestible fructan prebiotic that selectively stimulates Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus, lowers postprandial glycemia, reduces serum LDL cholesterol by 7–15%, enhances calcium and magnesium absorption by 18–25%, and supports satiety and weight management. Clinical and preclinical evidence further supports antidiabetic, hepatoprotective, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and anti-carcinogenic activities. As a functional food ingredient, Jerusalem-artichoke inulin and powder are successfully applied in bakery (5–10% wheat-flour substitution), dairy fermented products, gluten-free pasta, low-calorie confectionery, meat fiber enrichment, infant formula, and as a coffee substitute. The review identifies tuber storage instability, limited variety improvement, and underdeveloped processing infrastructure as principal constraints, and highlights the strong potential for cultivation expansion in Uzbekistan and other Central Asian countries given the crop’s low water demand and high resilience under continental-arid conditions.
Downloads
References
Gibson G.R., Hutkins R., Sanders M.E., Prescott S.L., Reimer R.A., Salminen S.J., Scott K., Stanton C., Swanson K.S., Cani P.D., Verbeke K., Reid G. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of prebiotics // Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. — 2017. — Vol. 14, № 8. — P. 491–502.
Slavin J. Fiber and prebiotics: Mechanisms and health benefits // Nutrients. — 2013. — Vol. 5, № 4. — P. 1417–1435.
Kays S.J., Nottingham S.F. Biology and Chemistry of Jerusalem Artichoke: Helianthus tuberosus L. — Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2008. — 478 p.
Yang L., He Q.S., Corscadden K., Udenigwe C.C. The prospects of Jerusalem artichoke in functional food ingredients and bioenergy production // Biotechnology Reports. — 2015. — Vol. 5. — P. 77–88.
Kosaric N., Cosentino G.P., Wieczorek A., Duvnjak Z. The Jerusalem artichoke as an agricultural crop // Biomass. — 1984. — Vol. 5, № 1. — P. 1–36.
Roberfroid M.B. Inulin-type fructans: Functional food ingredients // Journal of Nutrition. — 2007. — Vol. 137, № 11 (Suppl.). — P. 2493S–2502S.
Niness K.R. Inulin and oligofructose: What are they? // Journal of Nutrition. — 1999. — Vol. 129, № 7 (Suppl.). — P. 1402S–1406S.
Le Bastard Q., Chapelet G., Javaudin F., Lepelletier D., Batard E., Montassier E. The effects of inulin on gut microbial composition: A systematic review of evidence from human studies // European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. — 2020. — Vol. 39, № 3. — P. 403–413.
Baldini M., Danuso F., Turi M., Vannozzi G.P. Evaluation of new clones of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) for inulin and sugar yield from stalks and tubers // Industrial Crops and Products. — 2004. — Vol. 19, № 1. — P. 25–40.
Sawicka B., Skiba D., Pszczółkowski P., Aslan I., Sharifi-Rad J., Krochmal-Marczak B. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as a medicinal plant and its natural products // Cellular and Molecular Biology. — 2020. — Vol. 66, № 4. — P. 160–177.
Rodrigues M.A., Sousa L., Cabanas J.E., Arrobas M. Tuber yield and leaf mineral composition of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) grown under different cropping systems // Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. — 2007. — Vol. 5, № 4. — P. 545–553.
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edition. — Brussels: IDF, 2021. — 135 p.
Spaeth E.B. Reflections of the historical introduction of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) to Europe // Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. — 2009. — Vol. 56, № 2. — P. 167–169.
Bach V., Kidmose U., Bjørn G.K., Edelenbos M. Effects of harvest time and variety on sensory quality and chemical composition of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) tubers // Food Chemistry. — 2012. — Vol. 133, № 1. — P. 82–89.
Kocsis L., Liebhard P., Praznik W. Effect of seasonal changes on content and profile of soluble carbohydrates in tubers of different varieties of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) // Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. — 2007. — Vol. 55, № 23. — P. 9401–9408.
Conde J.R., Tenorio J.L., Rodríguez-Maribona B., Ayerbe L. Tuber yield of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) in relation to water stress // Biomass and Bioenergy. — 1991. — Vol. 1, № 3. — P. 137–142.
Gunnarsson I.B., Svensson S.-E., Johansson E., Karakashev D., Angelidaki I. Potential of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as a biorefinery crop // Industrial Crops and Products. — 2014. — Vol. 56. — P. 231–240.
Liu Z.X., Spiertz J.H.J., Sha J., Xue S., Xie G.H. Growth and yield performance of Jerusalem artichoke clones in a semiarid region of China // Agronomy Journal. — 2012. — Vol. 104, № 6. — P. 1538–1546.
Monti A., Amaducci M.T., Venturi G. Growth response, leaf gas exchange and fructans accumulation of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) as affected by different water regimes // European Journal of Agronomy. — 2005. — Vol. 23, № 2. — P. 136–145.
Saengkanuk A., Nuchadomrong S., Jogloy S., Patanothai A., Srijaranai S. A simplified spectrophotometric method for the determination of inulin in Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers // European Food Research and Technology. — 2011. — Vol. 233, № 4. — P. 609–616.
Kelly G. Inulin-type prebiotics — A review: Part 1 // Alternative Medicine Review. — 2008. — Vol. 13, № 4. — P. 315–329.
Cieslik E., Gębusia A., Florkiewicz A., Mickowska B. The content of protein and of amino acids in Jerusalem artichoke tubers (Helianthus tuberosus L.) of red variety Rote Zonenkugel // Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Technologia Alimentaria. — 2011. — Vol. 10, № 4. — P. 433–441.
Pan L., Sinden M.R., Kennedy A.H., Chai H., Watson L.E., Graham T.L., Kinghorn A.D. Bioactive constituents of Helianthus tuberosus (Jerusalem artichoke) // Phytochemistry Letters. — 2009. — Vol. 2, № 1. — P. 15–18.
Showler A.T. Roots of Jerusalem artichoke as an attractant for adult sweetpotato weevils // International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. — 1997. — Vol. 17, № 1. — P. 33–40.
Kelly G. Inulin-type prebiotics: A review (Part 2) // Alternative Medicine Review. — 2009. — Vol. 14, № 1. — P. 36–55.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shukurova Kamola Erkin qizi, Kholmuradov Bobur Bahrom o‘g‘li

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Individual articles are published Open Access under the Creative Commons Licence: CC-BY 4.0.