Improving Students' Didactic Competences Based on Interactive Educational Methods in The Process of Independent Work

Authors

  • Yulchiyeva Dildora Khabibullayevna Doctor of Philosophy in Pedagogical Sciences, PhD, Head of the Department of "Scientific Research, Innovations and Training of Scientific Pedagogical Personnel" of the National Institute of Art and Design, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/jsshrf-06-04-06

Keywords:

Didactic competence, Interactive educational methods, Independent work

Abstract

This study examines the improvement of students' didactic competences through the use of interactive educational methods in the process of independent work. Modern education emphasizes student-centered learning, where independent activities play a key role in developing critical thinking, self-regulation, and practical skills. The application of interactive methods such as problem-based tasks, discussions, case studies, and collaborative learning enhances students’ engagement and motivation. These approaches help learners effectively organize knowledge, analyze information, and apply theoretical concepts in practice. As a result, interactive independent learning contributes to the development of stronger didactic competences and prepares students for continuous learning and professional development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.

Brookfield, S. D. (2013). Powerful Techniques for Teaching Adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative Learning: Improving University Instruction by Basing Practice on Validated Theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3–4), 85–118.

Prince, M. (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press.

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London: Routledge.

Barkley, E. F. (2010). Student Engagement Techniques: A Handbook for College Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The Adult Learner: The Definitive Classic in Adult Education and Human Resource Development (8th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

Freeman, S., et al. (2014). Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.

Sherov, U., Saliyeva, N., Anvarova, M., Jurayev, Z., Salomova, F., Iskandarov, S., & Adilova, S. (2026). Exploring Epigenetic Responses to Occupational Stress in Tourism Workers and Implications for Mental Health. Genetics and Molecular Research, 25(1), 1-11.

Abdiganievich, I. S. Views On Ethnoponyms Of Arabics Living In Central Asia. World Bulletin of Social Sciences, 20, 90-93.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-20

How to Cite

Yulchiyeva Dildora Khabibullayevna. (2026). Improving Students’ Didactic Competences Based on Interactive Educational Methods in The Process of Independent Work. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals, 6(04), 26–29. https://doi.org/10.55640/jsshrf-06-04-06