Articles | Open Access | https://doi.org/10.55640/jsshrf-05-08-03

Cognitive Analysis of Metaphor and Emotions in Political Discourse: The Case of The President of Uzbekistan’s Speeches

Axmadjonova Nargizaxon Yo‘lchiboy qizi , Researcher at Kokand State University, Uzbekistan

Abstract

This article analyzes the role of metaphor and emotions in political discourse from the perspective of cognitive linguistics. The research object consists of official speeches delivered by the President of Uzbekistan, Shavkat Mirziyoyev, between 2016 and 2024. The study identifies the main conceptual metaphor models – “journey”, “house/building”, “struggle/battle”, and “nature/renewal” – and examines their communicative functions. Emotional elements such as hope, pride, responsibility, and motivation, used in the speeches, are also analyzed to reveal their role in inspiring, uniting, and shaping public consciousness. The results demonstrate that metaphors and emotions in presidential speeches serve not merely as stylistic ornamentation but as powerful cognitive tools for conceptualizing and conveying political ideas.

Keywords

Political discourse, metaphor, emotion

References

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.

Musolff, A. (2016). Metaphor and Political Discourse. Cambridge University Press.

Х. Абдуллаева (2020). “Сиёсий нутқда метафораларнинг лингвомаданий хусусиятлари”. Тошкент.

М. Ўринбоева (2019). “Ўзбек сиёсий матнларида ҳиссийлик”. Тошкент.

Shavkat Mirziyoyevning rasman e’lon qilingan nutqlari (2016–2024).

Article Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Copyright License

Download Citations

How to Cite

Axmadjonova Nargizaxon Yo‘lchiboy qizi. (2025). Cognitive Analysis of Metaphor and Emotions in Political Discourse: The Case of The President of Uzbekistan’s Speeches. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Fundamentals, 5(08), 16–19. https://doi.org/10.55640/jsshrf-05-08-03